One-year online workshop

Good Statistical Practice
in Oncology

From hazard ratios to trial design — statistics in the language of cancer medicine.

100% online 📅 Biweekly Saturday · 3:00–5:00 PM IST 26 fortnightly sessions 56 guided tasks 90 minutes each Live & hands-on
About the programme

Statistics that speak the language of cancer medicine

This programme turns the statistics behind modern oncology into working knowledge. Across a year, practising and trainee oncologists learn to read a trial correctly, judge why a design was chosen, and run the core analyses themselves — with the syllabus deliberately weighted toward the two things you meet every week: time-to-event analysis and clinical trial design. Every session ends with a hands-on task, so the methods are practised, not just heard.

26Sessions
56Guided tasks
6Modules
1Capstone

How it works

  • 26 fortnightly sessions across 12 months
  • Every other Saturday, 3:00–5:00 PM IST — live on Zoom
  • 90 minutes each: concept, worked examples, discussion
  • Fully online — delivered live, recorded for catch-up
  • Hands-on demonstrations in R — no coding background assumed
  • One to three set tasks after every session — 56 in all
  • Certificate through an end-of-year capstone project

What you'll be able to do

  • Interpret hazard ratios, Kaplan–Meier curves and forest plots with confidence
  • Choose appropriate endpoints and reason about estimands
  • Tell prognostic from predictive biomarkers and avoid subgroup traps
  • Judge phase I–III, adaptive and platform trial designs
  • Appraise real-world evidence and external-control analyses
  • Read and critique an oncology paper end-to-end
The year at a glance

Six blocks · 26 sessions · one capstone

The survival and trial-design blocks are the core of the syllabus; foundations can be compressed for an experienced cohort.

BlockTitleSessionsTasks
01Foundations in Cancer Data1 – 48
02Comparing Groups5 – 76
03Survival Analysis Core8 – 1318
04Oncology Trial Design Core14 – 1912
05Biomarkers, Synthesis & Real-World Data20 – 2410
06Appraisal & Capstone25 – 262 + project
01
Block One · Sessions 1–4 · 8 tasks

Foundations in Cancer Data

The groundwork, framed in oncology terms.

SESSION 01Biostatistics in Oncology & Study Designs

The oncology evidence hierarchy; observational versus experimental designs; and how bias, confounding and immortal-time bias arise in cancer research.

2 tasks · classify studies · spot the bias
SESSION 02Cancer Data & Exploratory Analysis

Clinical, pathology, registry and genomic data types; building an analysis-ready dataset; and constructing a clear baseline "Table 1".

2 tasks · clean a registry extract · build Table 1
SESSION 03Diagnostic & Screening Test Evaluation

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV and likelihood ratios; ROC curves for tumour markers; and lead-time and length-time bias in screening.

2 tasks · compute sens/spec/PPV · read a ROC
SESSION 04Effect Measures & Confidence Intervals

Risk ratio, odds ratio, hazard ratio and number-needed-to-treat; absolute versus relative benefit for patient communication; reading confidence intervals.

2 tasks · convert RR/OR/NNT · interpret CIs
A lighter note · Correlation ≠ Causation Ice-cream sales and sunburns rise and fall together all summer. They are clearly devoted to each other — and neither one is treating the other.

Or register for the entire year and save.

Register for full year — ₹2,000
02
Block Two · Sessions 5–7 · 6 tasks

Comparing Groups

The inference toolkit.

SESSION 05Hypothesis Testing & p-values in Oncology

Type I and II error; multiplicity across multiple endpoints and interim looks; one- versus two-sided testing; and why a p-value is never the whole story.

2 tasks · spot multiplicity · match tests
SESSION 06Comparing Means & Response Rates

t-tests and ANOVA; chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for objective response rates; paired comparisons; and choosing the right test.

2 tasks · run t-test & chi-square · justify choice
SESSION 07Non-parametric Methods & Response Data

Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis tests; analysing ordinal RECIST-category data; and reading and building waterfall plots.

2 tasks · analyse RECIST · build a waterfall plot
A lighter note · The significance threshold p = 0.049: statistically significant, technically — and visibly relieved to have squeaked in under the line. We'll teach you why that line deserves more suspicion than celebration.

Or register for the entire year and save.

Register for full year — ₹2,000
03
Block Three · Core · Sessions 8–13 · 18 tasks

Survival Analysis Core

The heart of oncology statistics.

SESSION 08Introduction to Survival Analysis

Censoring; defining OS, PFS and DFS precisely; Kaplan–Meier estimation; and median and landmark survival probabilities.

3 tasks · define endpoints · fit & read a KM curve
SESSION 09Comparing Survival Curves

The log-rank and stratified log-rank tests; number-at-risk tables; and the pitfalls of crossing curves and early-versus-late separation.

3 tasks · log-rank · at-risk table · crossing curves
SESSION 10Cox Proportional Hazards Model

Hazard ratios and what they really mean; covariate adjustment and stratification; and checking the proportional-hazards assumption.

3 tasks · fit Cox · interpret HRs · test PH
SESSION 11Beyond the Hazard Ratio

Time-varying covariates; non-proportional hazards under immunotherapy; and restricted mean survival time as an interpretable alternative.

3 tasks · time-varying covariate · RMST · HR limits
SESSION 12Competing Risks

Cause-specific versus subdistribution hazards; cumulative incidence of cancer death versus other-cause death; and the Fine–Gray model.

3 tasks · cumulative incidence · Fine-Gray · contrast
SESSION 13Multistate Models & Clinical Pathways

Illness-death and progression-to-death models that capture the whole disease course rather than a single endpoint.

3 tasks · define states · fit illness-death · interpret
A lighter note · Proportional hazards, allegedly When the survival curves cross, a single hazard ratio quietly packs up and goes home. The statistician in the corner has questions. Session 11 has the answers.

The core of the syllabus. Or register for the entire year and save.

Register for full year — ₹2,000
04
Block Four · Core · Sessions 14–19 · 12 tasks

Oncology Trial Design Core

Phase I through platform trials.

SESSION 14Endpoints & Estimands

OS versus PFS versus ORR versus duration of response; surrogate endpoints and their validation; and the estimands framework for intercurrent events.

2 tasks · match endpoints · specify an estimand
SESSION 15Phase I Dose-Finding Designs

Toxicity and the MTD; rule-based 3+3 versus model-based CRM and BOIN designs; and dose escalation and expansion cohorts.

2 tasks · run 3+3 · compare model-based
A lighter note · The n = 3 cohort Three patients: brave for a phase-I dose cohort, alarming as an evidence base. Knowing which one you're looking at is the whole point of trial design.
SESSION 16Phase II Designs

Simon's two-stage design; single-arm versus randomised phase II; go/no-go decision rules; and futility stopping.

2 tasks · set up Simon's two-stage · define go/no-go
SESSION 17Phase III Randomised Controlled Trials

Randomisation, stratification and blinding; intention-to-treat versus per-protocol; analysis populations; and the logic of event-driven trials.

2 tasks · stratified randomisation · ITT vs PP
SESSION 18Sample Size & Power

Powering survival endpoints by number of events; hazard-ratio-based sample size; and non-inferiority and equivalence designs.

2 tasks · events needed for target HR · size NI
SESSION 19Adaptive, Bayesian & Platform Designs

Interim analyses and stopping boundaries; basket and umbrella trials; master protocols; and Bayesian adaptive randomisation.

2 tasks · interim boundary · basket-trial sketch

Or register for the entire year and save.

Register for full year — ₹2,000
05
Block Five · Sessions 20–24 · 10 tasks

Biomarkers, Synthesis & Real-World Data

Evidence beyond the single trial.

SESSION 20Biomarkers: Prognostic versus Predictive

The crucial distinction; subgroup-analysis pitfalls; interaction tests; multiplicity across subgroups; and biomarker-stratified designs.

2 tasks · interaction test · critique subgroups
SESSION 21Regression for Oncology Outcomes

Logistic regression for response; Poisson and negative-binomial models for adverse-event rates; and building and validating a prognostic model.

2 tasks · logistic model · validate prognostic score
A lighter note · Overfitting An overfitted model threads perfectly through every patient it has already seen — then face-plants on the very next one. The straight line knew its limits.
SESSION 22Meta-analysis of Oncology Trials

Pooling hazard ratios; fixed versus random effects; forest and funnel plots; heterogeneity; and an introduction to network meta-analysis.

2 tasks · pool HRs into forest · assess heterogeneity
SESSION 23Real-World Evidence & External Controls

Registry and EHR data; propensity scores and matching; external and synthetic control arms; and target-trial emulation.

2 tasks · propensity weights · target-trial emulation
SESSION 24Missing Data & Quality-of-Life Endpoints

Informative censoring; missingness in patient-reported and QoL data; multiple imputation; and sensitivity analyses.

2 tasks · multiple imputation · MNAR sensitivity
A lighter note · A forest plot, taken literally Each estimate is, in fact, a tree. The diamond at the bottom is the pooled result — and the only thing in this forest that isn't foliage.

Or register for the entire year and save.

Register for full year — ₹2,000
06
Block Six · Sessions 25–26 · 2 tasks + capstone

Appraisal & Capstone

Putting it all together.

SESSION 25Critical Appraisal & Reporting

Reading an oncology trial paper critically; CONSORT and RECIST reporting; interpreting Kaplan–Meier curves and forest plots at a glance; and spotting common statistical errors.

2 tasks · appraise a trial · find planted flaws
SESSION 26Capstone Presentations

Participants take an oncology dataset or a published trial end-to-end — design critique, analysis and interpretation — and present for discussion and feedback.

Capstone project · design-critique · analyse · present
A lighter note · The significant subgroup Test enough subgroups and one will cross the line by sheer luck — here it is, basking in its spotlight. Renaming the trial after it is optional, and firmly resisted.

Or register for the entire year and save.

Register for full year — ₹2,000
Notes for delivery

How the programme runs

Online delivery

Run entirely online over live video and recorded for catch-up — no travel, with scheduling that accommodates participants across time zones.

Task structure

56 guided tasks plus the capstone — most sessions carry two, the survival block carries three, and every task uses real or realistic oncology data.

Case-based

Each session is anchored in a familiar landmark trial, keeping the statistics concrete and clinically motivated.

Recurring dataset

One or two real oncology datasets run across the year, so participants see the same patients analysed many different ways.

Flexible pacing

The survival and trial-design blocks are the core; foundations can be compressed for an experienced cohort.

Tooling

Demonstrations are in R; the statistical content maps directly onto SPSS or Stata for those who prefer them.

Ready to join the programme?

Reserve your seat for the full year, or start with a single session that interests you. Registration takes a minute; payment is via Razorpay UPI.

Register for the full year → Pick a single session
Full year · ₹2,000 Per session · ₹200 Certificate on capstone completion
Enquiries & registration

Get in touch

Mobile
+91 98468 63789
Organisation
StatsCure Network
Private Limited